Difference between revisions of "Meetings"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Rubenwardy (talk | contribs) |
Rubenwardy (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* Consistent formspec co-ords https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/8524 | * Consistent formspec co-ords https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/8524 | ||
+ | * Custom particle generators for particle spawners https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/6688 | ||
'''MTG discussion/reviews''' | '''MTG discussion/reviews''' |
Revision as of 23:19, 20 June 2019
Upcoming Meetings
2019-06-X
Arranged by: rubenwardy
Organisation discussion
- Is 5.0.2 needed for the newlines in setting name bug? (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/8590)
- What is needed to have good mobs in Minetest / Minetest Game? I suggest roping in mob devs like tenplus1 and stujones1
PR discussion/reviews
- Consistent formspec co-ords https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/8524
- Custom particle generators for particle spawners https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/6688
MTG discussion/reviews
Past Meetings
July-August 2018
Aranged by: Krock
Organisation discussion
- Will there be a 0.4.18 release?
- http://irc.minetest.net/minetest-dev/2018-07-14#i_5358759 - sounds like a definitive "no"?
- Specify a rough 5.0.0 release date (month, year)
- Freeze for multiple weeks for testing & fixing
- Forums: Clarify which rules (amongst license) apply for WIP modpacks/mods/games
PR discussion/reviews
- Colorize command parameters and privilege names (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/7019)
- Improves readability - does it need `string.format` for a possibly prettier code?
- Protocol cleanups https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/7348
- Review needed (compat break)
June 2018
Aranged by: Krock
Organisation discussion
- Will there be a 0.4.18 release?
- Bugfixing the bugfix release
- Proposal: change master version scheme to: 5.0.0
PR discussion/reviews
- Colorize command parameters and privilege names (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/7019)
- Improves readability - does it need `string.format` for a possibly prettier code?
- Lua parameter reading https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/7410
- Good design concept? Comments?
- Protocol cleanups https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/7348
- Review needed (compat break)
- CSM keypress - is this advantage acceptable? https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/7008
- Needs flavors to be added: http://irc.minetest.net/minetest-dev/2018-06-11#i_5329651
2018-05-19
Aranged by: Krock
Proposed time: 18:00 UTC
Organisation discussion
- 0.4.17 - backport missing fixes and set date for freeze
- ~Android-specific fix for https://pastebin.com/j4mjniaq must be added too (during freeze?)~
- Needs buildbot fixes (404 packages)
- Backport https://github.com/minetest/minetest/commit/4bb41a19d (http://irc.minetest.net/minetest-dev/2018-05-19#i_5310266)
- 0.4.17 - set release date
PR discussion/reviews
- Colorize command parameters and privilege names (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/7019)
- Improves readability - does it need `string.format` for a possibly prettier code?
- Fix missing ignore textures (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/7326)
- Needs more dev opinions & reviewing
2018-05-05
Aranged by: Krock
It's now almost a month since the last meeting - it time for the next one. Proposed time: 18:00 UTC
Organisation discussion
- When do we have time to release 0.4.17?
- Still unclear freeze and release dates. 1 MTE needs backporting first
- Whether to leave the issue number link in a commit message when merging on Github
- MTE: Keep the numbers if they're inserted automatically (high PR count, helpful for the web interface blame or fast jumps in commits)
- MTG: The numbers may be removed if wanted (small amount of PRs)
- http://irc.minetest.net/minetest-dev/2018-05-05#i_5298887
PR discussion/reviews
- Colorize command parameters and privilege names (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/7019)
- Improves readability - does it need `string.format` for a possibly prettier code?
- Abort when trying to set a not registered node (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/7011)
- Needs more dev opinions & reviewing
2018-04-07
Aranged by: Krock
Organisation discussion
- Questions related to 0.4.17, 0.4.18 or future development?
- 0.4.17 release should be moved to 21/22 April for backports (http://irc.minetest.net/minetest-dev/2018-04-07#i_5272834)
- Feature/backport freeze after 14 April to have enough time for testing
PR discussion/review
- Android joystick (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/7126)
- Formspecs: Add a <use_color_alpha> parameter to the box[] element (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/7116)
- Causes errors in-game for older clients but doesn't affect playability - merge or not?
- Colorize command parameters and privilege names (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/7019)
- Improves readability - does it need `string.format` for a possibly prettier code?
MTG discussion/reviews
- Tools: rebalance (https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/1681)
- Needs either a levelling system and/or special abilities for different materials to add variety
- paramat suggests removing bronze, which is incorrectly a stronger tool than steel (http://irc.minetest.net/minetest-dev/2018-04-07#i_5272959)
- Future mese concept: http://irc.minetest.net/minetest-dev/2018-04-07#i_5273013
2018-03-31
Aranged by: Krock
PR discussion/reviews
- Introduce clang-tidy to the CI (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/6295)
- Android joystick (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/7126)
- Minor change requests, discussion about joystick placement
0.4.17 release schedule
- Definitive release date
- Announced. 15 April 2018, see https://forum.minetest.net/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=19905
- Any new, important bugfixes to backport?
- Added the `core.rotate_node` bugfix, otherwise probably not. It's pretty much stable.
- Volunteer for cherry-picking the ToDo backport commits (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/6746)
- `<sfan5> probably me` (http://irc.minetest.net/minetest-dev/2018-03-31#i_5264276)
2018-03-10
Aranged by: Krock
Organisation discussion
- New Doxygen rule
- Log: http://irc.minetest.net/minetest-dev/2018-03-10#i_5249578
- Opposed: paramat, sfan5, SmallJoker, Shara
- Comments in the functions directly are more welcome
- Group issues in projects?
- Log: http://irc.minetest.net/minetest-dev/2018-03-10#i_5249600
- Purpose is unclear and questionable due missing information, needs to be discussed later again
PR discussion/reviews
- Remove texture pack caching (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/6660)
- Don’t create CSM script env (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/6951)
- Log: http://irc.minetest.net/minetest-dev/2018-03-10#i_5249625
- Needs improvement, questionable solution due request of server-provided CSM (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/5393)
- “Bugfix” for 0.4-backported rotate_node calls (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/6900)
- SmallJoker will test again and possibly merge after success
- Android C++11 build fix (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/6796)
- Log: http://irc.minetest.net/minetest-dev/2018-03-10#i_5249684
- sfan5 and nerzhul will try to test it soon. It does not break the regular setup, so a merge is to expect soon
- Confirmed working by Wayward_One (http://irc.minetest.net/minetest-dev/2018-03-10#i_5249720)
- Autogenerated settings header (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/6728)
- Log: http://irc.minetest.net/minetest-dev/2018-03-10#i_5249703 (stub)
- Needs attention
0.4.17 release schedule
- Definitive release date
- absent nerzhul: “release 0.4.17 ASAP” (http://irc.minetest.net/minetest-dev/2018-03-10#i_5249422)
- Are there any new, important bugfixes to backport?
- Volunteer for cherry-picking the 6 TODO (+ ^ from above) commits (https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/6746)